4.0 Article

Regeneration of Plants from Alginate-encapsulated Shoot Tips of Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.)

Journal

ERWERBS-OBSTBAU
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 307-314

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10341-021-00632-z

Keywords

BAP; IBA; In vitro; Micropropagation; ISSR; Myrtle; Myrtus communis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the in vitro conservation of Myrtle by encapsulating regenerated shoot tips. Synthetic seed production and subsequent conversion of encapsulated shoot tips into plantlets were successful. The genetic stability of the plants was confirmed through genetic marker analysis.
Myrtle growing naturally in the Mediterranean Region in Turkey, is among the economically important plant species. The present study emphasized on in vitro conservation of M. communis by encapsulating regenerated shoot tips. In this research we reported synthetic seed production and subsequent conversion of encapsulated shoot tips into plantlets comparing with nonencapsulated shoot tips for myrtle. Two different myrtle genotypes were used for synthetic seed production. Sodium alginate solution at the rate of 3.0% and 100 mM calcium chloride solution were prepared for encapsulation. Encapsulation was accomplished by mixing shoot tips into sodium alginate solution and dropping these in calcium chloride solution for 25-30 min. Encapsulated and nonencapsulated shoot tips were cultured in MS (Murashige and Skoog) media supplemented with different BAP (6-Benzylaminopurine) concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, 2 mg L-1). After six weeks, all shoots were transferred to MS media containing 1 mg L-1 IBA for in vitro rooting. As a result, the highest germination rate was obtained on the BAP-free MS media. The best BAP concentrations were detected as 0.5 and 1 mg L-1 for micropropagation. Genetic stability of plants coming from encapsulated and nonencapsulated shoot tips was tested by ISSR markers. Based on the results, there were no genetic differences among the samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available