4.7 Article

Nonconvex Nonsmooth Low Rank Minimization via Iteratively Reweighted Nuclear Norm

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 829-839

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2015.2511584

Keywords

Nonconvex low rank minimization; iteratively reweighted nuclear norm algorithm

Funding

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation under its International Research Centre, Singapore Funding Initiative
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB352502]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation (NSF) of China [61272341, 61231002]
  4. Microsoft Research Asia Collaborative Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nuclear norm is widely used as a convex surrogate of the rank function in compressive sensing for low rank matrix recovery with its applications in image recovery and signal processing. However, solving the nuclear norm-based relaxed convex problem usually leads to a suboptimal solution of the original rank minimization problem. In this paper, we propose to use a family of nonconvex surrogates of L-0-norm on the singular values of a matrix to approximate the rank function. This leads to a nonconvex nonsmooth minimization problem. Then, we propose to solve the problem by an iteratively reweighted nuclear norm (IRNN) algorithm. IRNN iteratively solves a weighted singular value thresholding problem, which has a closed form solution due to the special properties of the nonconvex surrogate functions. We also extend IRNN to solve the nonconvex problem with two or more blocks of variables. In theory, we prove that the IRNN decreases the objective function value monotonically, and any limit point is a stationary point. Extensive experiments on both synthesized data and real images demonstrate that IRNN enhances the low rank matrix recovery compared with the state-of-the-art convex algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available