4.6 Review

Probabilistic modeling of rockfall trajectories: a review

Journal

BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages 1163-1176

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-015-0718-9

Keywords

Rockfall trajectory; Probabilistic modeling; Uncertainty; Random sampling; Rock shape; Rockfall intensity

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [41272354, 41072241]
  2. One Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. Railway Ground Hazard Research Program (RGHRP) of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Probabilistic approaches are widely adopted for the modeling of rockfall trajectories, but are not widely discussed in the literature. This paper aims to help fill this gap by reviewing probabilistic models of rockfall trajectories, while providing some perspectives for future study. We first make it clear that, from a theoretical point of view, the probabilistic approach is necessitated by both the ontic (inherent) uncertainty associated with rockfalls and the epistemic (information) uncertainty associated with numerical modeling. The review suggests that there may be the potential to improve the probabilistic modeling of rockfall trajectories in various aspects, including the systematic probabilistic modeling criterion, the random sampling approaches employed for probabilistic variables, the probabilistic modeling of rock shape, and the probabilistic prediction of rockfall intensity. However, there are still some open questions regarding the promotion of probabilistic modeling in practice. It is not clear whether probabilistically treating all of the variables of rockfall trajectory model with reasoned distributions will lead to significantly improved results, or whether the improvements will be great enough (given the difficulties and costs involved) that it is worth quantifying all of the uncertainties involved in rockfall trajectory modeling. The answers to these questions can be found in the practice of probabilistic modeling itself.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available