4.5 Article

Inferring SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding into wastewater relative to the time of infection

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268821002752

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; virus shedding; waste water; environmental monitoring; wastewater-based epidemiological monitoring; public health surveillance

Funding

  1. NSF RAPID grant [2027752]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study suggests that RNA shedding of SARS-CoV-2 into wastewater peaks around 6 days after infection, and wastewater surveillance has limited utility in predicting transmission trends. It may be most useful as an early warning in areas with low transmission or delayed/limited clinical testing.
Since the start of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been interest in using wastewater monitoring as an approach for disease surveillance. A significant uncertainty that would improve the interpretation of wastewater monitoring data is the intensity and timing with which individuals shed RNA from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) into wastewater. By combining wastewater and case surveillance data sets from a university campus during a period of heightened surveillance, we inferred that individual shedding of RNA into wastewater peaks on average 6 days (50% uncertainty interval (UI): 6-7; 95% UI: 4-8) following infection, and that wastewater measurements are highly overdispersed [negative binomial dispersion parameter, k = 0.39 (95% credible interval: 0.32-0.48)]. This limits the utility of wastewater surveillance as a leading indicator of secular trends in SARS-CoV-2 transmission during an epidemic, and implies that it could be most useful as an early warning of rising transmission in areas where transmission is low or clinical testing is delayed or of limited capacity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available