4.7 Article

Multi-criteria decision making and Dempster-Shafer model-based delineation of groundwater prospect zones from a semi-arid environment

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 31, Pages 47740-47758

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19211-0

Keywords

Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); Dempster-Shafer model; Groundwater potential; Bundelkhand India; Hydrological evaluations

Funding

  1. Natural Resources Data Management System (NRDMS), Department of Science and Technology [NRDMS/01/267/019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study delineated the groundwater potential zones in a critical and drought-affected area in Uttar Pradesh, India, using GIS tools and remote sensing data. Thematic maps were created based on various factors, and a multi-criteria decision making method was used to assign weights to these factors. The study also tested the Dempster-Shafer model and found that it had higher accuracy than the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) model.
The present study illustrates the delineation of the groundwater potential zones in one of the most critical and drought-affected areas under Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh (India). Hydrological evaluations were carried out using GIS tools and remote sensing data which ultimately yielded several thematic maps, such as lineament density, land use/land cover, drainage density, lithology, slope, geomorphology, topographic wetness index (TWI), DEM, and soil. Thematic layers were assigned relative weightages as per their groundwater potential prospects under multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method through analytical hierarchy process (AHP). To recognize the groundwater potential zone, weighted overlay analysis was also performed. Additionally, for testing of the Dempster-Shafer model, 16 wells in the study area have been selected. Based on the probability of the groundwater occurrence, the belief factor was equated to delineate groundwater potential zones which illustrate five different potential zones. According to the AHP model, the northwest side of the study area is characterized with very high potential zones whereas the northeast and southeast regions constitute medium and low groundwater potential zones respectively. According to the DS model, very high groundwater potential zones constitute 17% and the remaining area falls under low potential. Overall accuracy of the DS model is higher than AHP model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available