4.7 Article

Genotoxic and mutagenic effects of chlorothalonil on the estuarine fish Micropogonias furnieri (Desmarest, 1823)

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 16, Pages 23504-23511

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17328-2

Keywords

Comet assay; Ecotoxicity; Fungicide; Micronucleus test; Nuclear abnormalities; Whitemouth croaker

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES-CIMAR II) [1988/201]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [CNPq-PQ 312341/2013-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that even at the lowest dose tested (0.35 μg g(-1)), chlorothalonil showed genotoxic and mutagenic effects, which increased in a dose-dependent manner with higher doses. This evidence suggests that the compound should be banned due to potential hazards to aquatic ecosystems and human health, outweighing any benefits to food production.
Chlorothalonil is a fungicide widely used in agriculture as well as an active ingredient in antifouling paints. Although it causes toxic effects on non-target organisms and can accumulate in fish tissues, little is known about its sublethal effects. Thus, genotoxic and mutagenic effects of intraperitoneal injected chlorothalonil in Micropogonias furnieri, an estuarine fish of frequent human consumption and a promising test-organism for ecotoxicological assays, were assessed. Chlorothalonil showed to be genotoxic (DNA damage by comet assay) and mutagenic (micronuclei, nuclear buds, apoptotic fragments, and bilobed cells) even at the lowest dose tested (0.35 mu g g(-1)) and in a dose-dependent manner (0.35 and 3.5 mu g g(-1)) for micronuclei, apoptotic fragments, and bilobed cells. As genomic instability may lead to carcinogenesis, the present evidence can assist decision-makers in banning this compound since any benefit toward food production is outweighed by the hazard to aquatic ecosystems and human health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available