4.7 Article

Viable medical waste chain network design by considering risk and robustness

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 53, Pages 79702-79717

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16727-9

Keywords

Viable; Medical waste chain; Network design; Resiliency; Sustainable; Robust optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Medical waste management is crucial in the COVID-19 situation, and we introduce a novel medical waste chain network design focusing on waste recovery to benefit the environment. Our approach utilizes robust stochastic programming to address flexibility and sustainability requirements, aiming to mitigate risks and improve resilience against demand fluctuation in the network.
Medical waste management (MWM) is an important and necessary problem in the COVID-19 situation for treatment staff. When the number of infectious patients grows up, the amount of MWMs increases day by day. We present medical waste chain network design (MWCND) that contains health center (HC), waste segregation (WS), waste purchase contractor (WPC), and landfill. We propose to locate WS to decrease waste and recover them and send them to the WPC. Recovering medical waste like metal and plastic can help the environment and return to the production cycle. Therefore, we proposed a novel viable MWCND by a novel two-stage robust stochastic programming that considers resiliency (flexibility and network complexity) and sustainable (energy and environment) requirements. Therefore, we try to consider risks by conditional value at risk (CVaR) and improve robustness and agility to demand fluctuation and network. We utilize and solve it by GAMS CPLEX solver. The results show that by increasing the conservative coefficient, the confidence level of CVaR and waste recovery coefficient increases cost function and population risk. Moreover, increasing demand and scale of the problem makes to increase the cost function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available