4.8 Article

Information Requirements under the Essential-Use Concept: PFA Case Studies

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 10, Pages 6232-6242

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03732

Keywords

PFAS; essential use; chrome plating; fluoropolymer; carpet

Funding

  1. IBM
  2. Swiss Federal Office for the Environment
  3. European Union [860665, PERFORCE3]
  4. NIH Superfund Research Program [P42ES027706]
  5. SERDP [ER18-1280, ER20-1293]
  6. National Science Foundation [1845336]
  7. CETOCOEN PLUS project [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000469]
  8. project CETOCOEN EXCELLENCE [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_043/0009632]
  9. RECETOX RI [LM2018121]
  10. Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports
  11. Global PFAS Science Panel
  12. Tides Foundation [1907-59084]
  13. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [860665] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  14. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  15. Directorate For Engineering [1845336] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that there are diverse uses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), with limited information on alternatives. PFAS in consumer products can be easily replaced, while their uses in industrial processes require thorough evaluation. It is necessary to enhance coordination among stakeholders to ensure a transparent and coordinated phase-out of PFAS.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are aclass of substances for which there are widespread concerns abouttheir extreme persistence in combination with toxic effects. It hasbeen argued that PFAS should only be employed in those uses thatare necessary for health or safety or are critical for the functioningof society and where no alternatives are available (essential-useconcept). Implementing the essential-use concept requires asufficient understanding of the current uses of PFAS and of theavailability, suitability, and hazardous properties of alternatives. Toillustrate the information requirements under the essential-useconcept, we investigate seven different PFAS uses, three inconsumer products and four industrial applications. We investigatehow much information is available on the types and functions of PFAS in these uses, how much information is available onalternatives, their performance and hazardous properties and,finally, whether this information is sufficient as a basis for deciding onthe essentiality of a PFAS use. The results show (i) the uses of PFAS are highly diverse and information on alternatives is oftenlimited or lacking; (ii) PFAS in consumer products often are relatively easy to replace; (iii) PFAS uses in industrial processes can behighly complex and a thorough evaluation of the technical function of each PFAS and of the suitability of alternatives is needed; (iv)more coordination among PFAS manufacturers, manufacturers of alternatives to PFAS, users of these materials, governmentauthorities, and other stakeholders is needed to make the process of phasing out PFAS more transparent and coherent

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available