Variability in Aromatic Aerosol Yields under Very Low NOx Conditions at Different HO2/RO2 Regimes

Current chemical transport models generally use a constant secondary organic aerosol (SOA) yield to represent SOA formation from aromatic compounds under low NOx conditions. However, a wide range of SOA yields (10 to 42%) from m-xylene under low NOx conditions is observed in this study. The chamber HO2/RO2 ratio is identified as a key factor explaining SOA yield variability: higher SOA yields are observed for runs with a higher HO2/RO2 ratio. The RO2 + RO2 pathway, which can be increasingly significant under low NOx and HO2/RO2 conditions, shows a lower SOA-forming potential compared to the RO2 + HO2 pathway. While the traditional low-NOx chamber experiments are commonly used to represent the RO2 + HO2 pathway, this study finds that the impacts of the RO2 + RO2 pathway cannot be ignored under certain conditions. We provide guidance on how to best control for these two pathways in conducting chamber experiments to best obtain SOA yield curves and quantify the contributions from each pathway. On the global scale, the chemical transport model GEOS-Chem is used to identify regions characterized by lower surface HO2/RO2 ratios, suggesting that the RO2 + RO2 pathway is more likely to prove significant to overall SOA yields in those regions. Current models generally do not consider the RO2 + RO2 impacts on aromatic SOA formation, but preliminary sensitivity tests with updated SOA yield parameters based on such a pathway suggest that without this consideration, some types of SOA may be overestimated in regions with lower HO2/RO2 ratios.

Automated summary

Current chemical transport models typically use a constant secondary organic aerosol (SOA) yield to represent SOA formation from aromatic compounds under low NOx conditions. However, this study finds a wide range of SOA yields from m-xylene under low NOx conditions, and identifies the chamber HO2/RO2 ratio as a key factor explaining the variability in SOA yield. The RO2 + RO2 pathway shows a lower potential for SOA formation compared to the RO2 + HO2 pathway. It is important to consider both pathways in conducting chamber experiments to obtain accurate SOA yield curves.