4.7 Article

Reconciling high resolution climate datasets using KrigR

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac39bf

Keywords

climate; datasets; KrigR; high resolution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is an increasing demand for high spatial and temporal resolution climate data among climate researchers, but current global climate model and reanalysis datasets do not match the required resolutions. The use of statistical methods like Kriging can accurately recover spatial heterogeneity in climate data and preserve uncertainty associated with statistical downscaling, helping to explain differences between widely used high resolution climate datasets.
There is an increasing need for high spatial and temporal resolution climate data for the wide community of researchers interested in climate change and its consequences. Currently, there is a large mismatch between the spatial resolutions of global climate model and reanalysis datasets (at best around 0.25 degrees and 0.1 degrees respectively) and the resolutions needed by many end-users of these datasets, which are typically on the scale of 30 arcseconds (similar to 900 m). This need for improved spatial resolution in climate datasets has motivated several groups to statistically downscale various combinations of observational or reanalysis datasets. However, the variety of downscaling methods and inputs used makes it difficult to reconcile the resultant differences between these high-resolution datasets. Here we make use of the KrigR R-package to statistically downscale the world-leading ERA5(-Land) reanalysis data using kriging. We show that kriging can accurately recover spatial heterogeneity of climate data given strong relationships with co-variates; that by preserving the uncertainty associated with the statistical downscaling, one can investigate and account for confidence in high-resolution climate data; and that the statistical uncertainty provided by KrigR can explain much of the difference between widely used high resolution climate datasets (CHELSA, TerraClimate, and WorldClim2) depending on variable, timescale, and region. This demonstrates the advantages of using KrigR to generate customized high spatial and/or temporal resolution climate data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available