4.7 Article

Decreasing methane emissions from China's coal mining with rebounded coal production

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac38d8

Keywords

methane emissions; coal mining; emission factors; bottom-up inventories; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72088101, 71774161]
  2. Environmental Defense Fund
  3. Major Program of National Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of China [21ZDA086]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [800015A369, 2021YQGL02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study on China's coal mine methane (CMM) emissions between 2010 and 2019 revealed that the annual emissions were estimated at 20.11 Tg with a decline trend. Factors such as the growth of CMM utilization, shift to lower-emission coal mining areas, and decrease of emission factors contributed to curbing the increasing trend of China's CMM emissions since 2012.
China is the world's largest anthropogenic methane (CH4) emitter, with coal mine methane (CMM) as one of the main contributors. However, previous studies have not reach consensus on the magnitude and trend of China's CMM emissions since 2010. Through distribution fitting and Monte Carlo methods, dynamic emission factors (EFs) of CMM at the province-level were derived with high confidence; along with the updated data on surface mining, abandoned coal mines, and methane utilization, we revealed that China's annual CMM emissions were estimated at 20.11 Tg between 2010 and 2019 with a decline of 0.93 Tg yr(-1). Although coal production was revived in 2017, we found that the growing trend of China's CMM emissions since 2012 were curbed by the previously-overlooked factors including the growth of CMM utilization and coal production from surface mining, and decrease of EFs driven by the closure of high CH4-content coal mines and a regional production shift to lower-emission areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available