4.7 Article

A 30 m global map of elevation with forests and buildings removed

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac4d4f

Keywords

digital elevation model; bare-earth; terrain; remote sensing; machine learning

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/S3003061/1]
  2. Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [NE/S3003061/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a method that uses machine learning to remove buildings and forests from the Copernicus Digital Elevation Model, generating a more accurate global map of elevation. By training the algorithm with unique reference elevation data from 12 countries, the method significantly reduces vertical errors in built-up areas and forests. The resulting elevation map is more accurate than existing global elevation maps.
Elevation data are fundamental to many applications, especially in geosciences. The latest global elevation data contains forest and building artifacts that limit its usefulness for applications that require precise terrain heights, in particular flood simulation. Here, we use machine learning to remove buildings and forests from the Copernicus Digital Elevation Model to produce, for the first time, a global map of elevation with buildings and forests removed at 1 arc second (similar to 30 m) grid spacing. We train our correction algorithm on a unique set of reference elevation data from 12 countries, covering a wide range of climate zones and urban extents. Hence, this approach has much wider applicability compared to previous DEMs trained on data from a single country. Our method reduces mean absolute vertical error in built-up areas from 1.61 to 1.12 m, and in forests from 5.15 to 2.88 m. The new elevation map is more accurate than existing global elevation maps and will strengthen applications and models where high quality global terrain information is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available