4.7 Article

The dark side of ambition: side-effects of China's climate policy

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac30bf

Keywords

China; climate change; COVID-19; energy; intersectional analysis; just transition; net zero emissions

Funding

  1. Fenner School of Environment and Society at the Australian National University [5998099]
  2. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201808190012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

China's recent commitments to the Paris Agreement have raised concerns about their feasibility. In order to achieve carbon neutrality, China has implemented extreme emission reduction measures, but the side-effects of its climate ambition have been overlooked. An intersectional and just transitions perspective is needed to examine limitations and trade-offs for broader societal goals.
China's latest commitments to the Paris Agreement have attracted great attention. Scholars have questioned the feasibility of China's pledges to peak emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. To achieve these goals, China has resorted to extreme emissions reduction actions. However, side-effects of China's climate ambition have been largely overlooked. An intersectional and just transitions perspective is critical to examine limits and trade-offs for broad societal goals. This paper outlines five policy approaches that can help limit adverse side-effects and unlock broader social benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available