Stronger Arctic amplification from ozone-depleting substances than from carbon dioxide

Arctic amplification (AA)-the greater warming of the Arctic near-surface temperature relative to its global mean value-is a prominent feature of the climate response to increasing greenhouse gases. Recent work has revealed the importance of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) in contributing to Arctic warming and sea-ice loss. Here, using ensembles of climate model integrations, we expand on that work and directly contrast Arctic warming from ODS to that from carbon dioxide (CO2), over the 1955-2005 period when ODS loading peaked. We find that the Arctic warming and sea-ice loss from ODS are slightly more than half (52%-59%) those from CO2. We further show that the strength of AA for ODS is 1.44 times larger than that for CO2, and that this mainly stems from more positive Planck, albedo, lapse-rate, and cloud feedbacks. Our results suggest that AA would be considerably stronger than presently observed had the Montreal Protocol not been signed.

Automated summary

Recent research highlights the significant contribution of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) to Arctic warming and sea-ice loss, with ODS causing slightly more than half of the warming and sea-ice loss compared to carbon dioxide (CO2). The Arctic amplification (AA) strength for ODS is 1.44 times larger than that for CO2, mainly due to more positive feedbacks such as Planck, albedo, lapse-rate, and cloud feedbacks. These findings imply that Arctic amplification would have been considerably stronger if the Montreal Protocol had not been signed.