4.7 Article

Robust Collaborative Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Hyperspectral Unmixing

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 54, Issue 10, Pages 6076-6090

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2580702

Keywords

Endmember extraction; hyperspectral imaging; robust collaborative nonnegativematrix factorization (R-CoNMF); spectral unmixing

Funding

  1. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation [UID/EEA/50008/2013]
  2. Chinese National Science Foundation [41431178]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spectral unmixing is an important technique for remotely sensed hyperspectral data exploitation. It amounts to identifying a set of pure spectral signatures, which are called endmembers, and their corresponding fractional, draftrulesabundances in each pixel of the hyperspectral image. Over the last years, different algorithms have been developed for each of the three main steps of the spectral unmixing chain: 1) estimation of the number of endmembers in a scene; 2) identification of the spectral signatures of the endmembers; and 3) estimation of the fractional abundance of each endmember in each pixel of the scene. However, few algorithms can perform all the stages involved in the hyperspectral unmixing process. Such algorithms are highly desirable to avoid the propagation of errors within the chain. In this paper, we develop a new algorithm, which is termed robust collaborative nonnegative matrix factorization (R-CoNMF), that can perform the three steps of the hyperspectral unmixing chain. In comparison with other conventional methods, R-CoNMF starts with an overestimated number of endmembers and removes the redundant endmembers by means of collaborative regularization. Our experimental results indicate that the proposed method provides better or competitive performance when compared with other widely used methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available