4.7 Article

An Iterative Haze Optimized Transformation for Automatic Cloud/Haze Detection of Landsat Imagery

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 2682-2694

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2504369

Keywords

Haze detection; haze optimized transformation (HOT); haze thickness; iterative HOT (IHOT); Landsat imagery

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301352]
  2. 863 Project [2013AA122802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most previous haze/cloud detection methods for Landsat imagery, e.g., haze optimized transformation (HOT), cannot adequately suppress land surface information and, in particular, often overestimate haze thickness over bright surfaces. This paper proposes an iterative HOT (IHOT) for improving haze detection with the help of a corresponding clear image. With an iterative procedure of regressions among HOT, the reflectance difference at the top of atmosphere (TOA) between hazy and clear images, and TOA reflectances of hazy and clear images, the land surface information can be removed, and the iterative HOT (IHOT) result is derived to spatially characterize the haze contamination in the Landsat images. A group of Landsat images that were acquired in different landscapes and seasons were used to test IHOT. Visual comparisons indicate that IHOT performed better than previous haze detection methods for images that were acquired in diverse landscapes and also performed robustly for hazy images that were acquired at different seasons when using the same reference clear image. Additionally, two indirect quantitative validations were used to illustrate that IHOT can provide the best transformation for accurately determining haze information. Therefore, it is expected that the proposed IHOT method will be used for automatic cloud/haze detection for large numbers of Landsat images if data sets of clear Landsat imagery are available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available