4.7 Article

Improving Multiyear Ice Concentration Estimates With Reanalysis Air Temperatures

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 2602-2614

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2503884

Keywords

Arctic sea ice; Environment Canada Ice Concentration Extractor (ECICE); ice concentration; microwave remote sensing; multiyear ice (MYI); surface air temperature

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiyear ice (MYI) characteristics can be retrieved from passive or active microwave remote sensing observations. One of the algorithms that combine both observations to identify partial concentrations of ice types (including MYI) is the Environment Canada Ice Concentration Extractor (ECICE). However, cycles of warm-cold air temperature trigger wet-dry cycles of the snow cover on MYI surface. Under wet snow conditions, anomalous brightness temperature and backscatter, similar to those of first-year ice (FYI), are observed. This leads to misidentification of MYI as being FYI, hence decreasing the estimated MYI concentration suddenly. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a correction scheme to restore the MYI concentration under this condition. The correction is based on air temperature records. It utilizes the fact that the warm spell in autumn lasts for a short period of time (a few days). The correction is applied to MYI concentration retrievals from ECICE using an input of combined QuikSCAT and AMSR-E data, acquired over the Arctic region in a series of autumn seasons from 2003 to 2008. The correction works well by replacing anomalous MYI concentrations with interpolated ones. For September of the six years, it introduces over 0.1 x 10(6) km(2) MYI area, except for 2005. Due to the regional effect of warm air spells, the correction could be important in the operational applications where ice concentrations are crucial on small scale and mesoscale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available