4.7 Article

Important contribution of N2O5 hydrolysis to the daytime nitrate in Xi' an, China during haze periods: Isotopic analysis and WRF-Chem model simulation

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 288, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117712

Keywords

Nitrate; NO2 andO(3); Aerosol liquid water content (ALWC); PM2.5; Ammonia

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Plan, Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Mechanism and chemical process characterization of atmospheric particulate matter multi-isotope fractionation) [2017YFC0212703]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41773117, 41325014]
  3. Institute of Eco-Chongming
  4. ECNU Happiness Flower

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study shows that N2O5 hydrolysis is an important pathway for nitrate formation in Chinese megacities, especially during haze episodes, as demonstrated by measurements and simulations.
Nitrate, as one of the major components of tropospheric aerosols, plays a crucial role in winter haze formation. While, the formation mechanism of the high production of nitrate in Chinese megacities is still not fully understood. To quantify the contributions of major formation pathways to nitrate, airborne particles in Xi'an, inland China during the winter of 2017 were measured and analyzed for the water-soluble ions and stable nitrogen/oxygen isotope compositions of nitrate in PM2.5, followed by a WRF-Chem model simulation. The oxygen isotopic results indicated that N2O5 hydrolysis was an important formation pathway for the daytime nitrate in the haze episodes. The model simulation further revealed that N2O5 hydrolysis contribution increased from 8.2% to 20.5% of the total nitrate over 14:00-16:00 p.m., clearly showing that N2O5 formation followed by a heterogeneous hydrolysis to nitrate can effectively proceed in daytime under the abundantly co-existing O-3, NO2 and NH3 conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available