Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 193, Issue 10, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-021-09447-7
Keywords
Air pollution; O-3; NOx; PM10; Personal exposure
Categories
Funding
- University of Gothenburg
- Formas (a Swedish Research Council for sustainable development) [210-2013805]
- Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation [2013-0279, 2016-0250]
- Swedish Cancer and Allergy Foundation [24212015]
- Asthma and Allergy Association [F2016-0039]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the associations between personal exposure to air pollution and ambient levels in two cities in Sweden. Results showed significant correlations between personal exposure levels of nitrogen oxides, ozone, and particulate matter with levels measured at air pollution monitoring stations. Stationary measurements were found to be valid indicators of exposure, with approximately 50-70% of the variation in personal exposure explained by stationary measurements.
Exposure to air pollution is of great concern for public health although studies on the associations between exposure estimates and personal exposure are limited and somewhat inconsistent. The aim of this study was to quantify the associations between personal nitrogen oxides (NOx), ozone (O-3) and particulate matter (PM10) exposure levels and ambient levels, and the impact of climate and time spent outdoors in two cities in Sweden. Subjects (n = 65) from two Swedish cities participated in the study. The study protocol included personal exposure measurements at three occasions, or waves. Personal exposure measurements were performed for NOx and O-3 for 24 h and PM10 for 24 h, and the participants kept an activity diary. Stationary monitoring stations provided hourly data of NOx, O-3 and PM, as well as data on air temperature and relative humidity. Data were analysed using mixed linear models with the subject-id as a random effect and stationary exposure and covariates as fixed effects. Personal exposure levels of NOx, O-3 and PM10 were significantly associated with levels measured at air pollution monitoring stations. The associations persisted after adjusting for temperature, relative humidity, city and wave, but the modelled estimates were slightly attenuated from 2.4% (95% CI 1.8-2.9) to 2.0% (0.97-2.94%) for NOx, from 3.7% (95% CI 3.1-4.4) to 2.1% (95% CI 1.1-2.9%) for O-3 and from 2.6% (95% 0.9-4.2%) to 1.3% (95% CI - 1.5-4.0) for PM10. After adding covariates, the degree of explanation offered by the model (coefficient of determination, or R-2) did not change for NOx (0.64 to 0.63) but increased from 0.46 to 0.63 for O-3, and from 0.38 to 0.43 for PM10. Personal exposure to NOx, O-3 and PM has moderate to good association with levels measured at urban background sites. The results indicate that stationary measurements are valid as measure of exposure in environmental health risk assessments, especially if they can be refined using activity diaries and meteorological data. Approximately 50-70% of the variation of the personal exposure was explained by the stationary measurement, implying occurrence of misclassification in studies using more crude exposure metrics, potentially leading to underestimates of the effects of exposure to ambient air pollution.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available