4.5 Article

Farm-Level Effects of Emissions Tax and Adjustable Drainage on Peatlands

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages 154-168

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-021-01543-1

Keywords

Climate-change mitigation; Agriculture; Land use; Farm management; Farm income; Climate policy

Funding

  1. Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland [312912, 336570]
  2. Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)
  3. Finnish Association of Academic Agronomists' grant Suomi kasvaa ruoasta (Oiva Kuusisto foundation) [LIFE14 CCM/FI/00254]
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [336570] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It was found in the study that investing in adjustable drainage systems on peatlands in farms in southwestern Finland can lead to significant greenhouse gas emissions reductions. However, high emission tax rates triggering such investments can also result in higher abatement costs, especially when not considering the effect of adjustable drainage on crop yields.
Drained agricultural peatlands emit significantly higher amounts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per hectare than mineral soils. GHG abatement costs for representative cereals (CF) and dairy (DF) farms in southwestern Finland were estimated by integrating an emission-based tax together with an option to invest in a subsidized adjustable drainage system on peat soils in a farm-level dynamic optimization model. With an average 10% share of peat soils from overall farm area, emissions tax rates over 15 (CF) and 19 (DF) euro/tCO(2)e triggered adjustable drainage investments with a significant reduction in GHG emissions per ha, when assuming no crop-yield effect from the adjustable drainage. Abatement costs for emissions tax rates euro12-50/tCO(2)e/ha were euro16-44/tCO(2)e (CF) and euro26-51/tCO(2)e (DF) for whole farm-soil emissions, depending on the share of peatlands on the farm, on the yield effects of adjustable drainage, and on crop prices. High emissions tax rates imply higher abatement costs since farms have a limited capability to adjust their production and land use. Thus, emissions reductions from peatlands can be achieved at reasonable costs when investing in adjustable drainage on peatlands. The income losses due to emissions tax, however, are high, but they can be compensated for farmers by lumpsum payments independent of their production decisions. Since existing agricultural policies such as the EU CAP system may have limited effectiveness on GHG emissions, the emissions tax and adjustable drainage on peatlands could promote GHG abatement significantly on farms and areas with abundant peatlands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available