4.6 Article

Optimal 3D Angle of Arrival Sensor Placement with Gaussian Priors

Journal

ENTROPY
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23111379

Keywords

3D angle of arrival (AOA) localization; Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB); optimal sensor placement; covariance matrix; fisher information matrix (FIM)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62071383, 6210012056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates sensor placement optimization in three-dimensional space for AOA target localization with Gaussian priors. A method using 3D rotation for optimal sensor placement is proposed, demonstrating lower MSE with nearly zero estimation bias compared to existing methods for 3-6 sensors.
Sensor placement is an important factor that may significantly affect the localization performance of a sensor network. This paper investigates the sensor placement optimization problem in three-dimensional (3D) space for angle of arrival (AOA) target localization with Gaussian priors. We first show that under the A-optimality criterion, the optimization problem can be transferred to be a diagonalizing process on the AOA-based Fisher information matrix (FIM). Secondly, we prove that the FIM follows the invariance property of the 3D rotation, and the Gaussian covariance matrix of the FIM can be diagonalized via 3D rotation. Based on this finding, an optimal sensor placement method using 3D rotation was created for when prior information exists as to the target location. Finally, several simulations were carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Compared with the existing methods, the mean squared error (MSE) of the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation using the proposed method is lower by at least 25% when the number of sensors is between 3 and 6, while the estimation bias remains very close to zero (smaller than 0.15 m).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available