4.6 Article

Analytical Expressions for Ising Models on High Dimensional Lattices

Journal

ENTROPY
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23121665

Keywords

Ising model on hypercube; free energy; density of states; m-vicinity method

Funding

  1. State Program of Scientific Research Institute for System Analysis, Russian Academy of Sciences [0065-2019-0003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study utilized an m-vicinity method to examine Ising models on hypercube lattices of high dimensions, revealing its applicability to both short and long-range interactions. Additionally, an expression for the critical temperature in terms of interaction constants was obtained and found to be in good agreement with computer simulation results.
We use an m-vicinity method to examine Ising models on hypercube lattices of high dimensions d & GE;3. This method is applicable for both short-range and long-range interactions. We introduce a small parameter, which determines whether the method can be used when calculating the free energy. When we account for interaction with the nearest neighbors only, the value of this parameter depends on the dimension of the lattice d. We obtain an expression for the critical temperature in terms of the interaction constants that is in a good agreement with the results of computer simulations. For d=5,6,7, our theoretical estimates match the numerical results both qualitatively and quantitatively. For d=3,4, our method is sufficiently accurate for the calculation of the critical temperatures; however, it predicts a finite jump of the heat capacity at the critical point. In the case of the three-dimensional lattice (d=3), this contradicts the commonly accepted ideas of the type of the singularity at the critical point. For the four-dimensional lattice (d=4), the character of the singularity is under current discussion. For the dimensions d=1, 2 the m-vicinity method is not applicable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available