4.7 Article

The corrosion behaviour of MAO coated AZ80 magnesium alloy with surface indentation of different sizes

Journal

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106185

Keywords

Magnesium alloy; MAO; Defect size; Indentation; Corrosion

Funding

  1. National Science of China [52071036, U2037601]
  2. Interdisciplinary and team building Program of Central Universities, China [2020CDJQY-A002, 2021CDJCGJ009]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang [2021C01086]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effect of surface indentation size on the corrosion behaviour of MAO coated AZ80 magnesium alloy. Various techniques, including laser confocal microscope, scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffractometer and electrochemical test, were used to study the corrosion process and damaged coatings. The results showed that the corrosion current density increased when the MAO coating was damaged with a certain impact height. Furthermore, the corrosion mechanism for coatings with different indentation sizes was clarified.
In order to investigate the effect of surface indentation size on the corrosion behaviour of MAO coated AZ80 magnesium alloy, the laser confocal microscope, scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffractometer and electrochemical test were carried out to study the corrosion process of MAO coated AZ80 and the coatings damaged with different impact heights. The results display that when MAO coating was damaged with the impact height of 400 mm, the corrosion current density of the specimen increased to 8.0 x 10(-1) mu A/cm(2) from 3.2 x 10(-1) mu A/cm(2) for MAO without indentation. After immersion for 72 h, the corrosion resistance of the damaged specimens decreased sharply because of the defects on the surface. Moreover, the corrosion mechanism for the coatings with different indentation sizes was clarified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available