4.6 Article

The direct interpolation boundary element method and the domain superposition technique applied to piecewise Helmholtz's problems with internal heterogeneity

Journal

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS
Volume 131, Issue -, Pages 41-50

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.06.008

Keywords

Boundary element method; Inhomogeneous Helmholtz's problems; Direct interpolation boundary element method; Domain superposition technique; Radial basis functions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study combines the direct interpolation boundary element method (DIBEM) and the domain superposition technique (DST) to solve piecewise inhomogeneous two-dimensional Helmholtz problems. The proposed methodology preserves the main features and advantages of the Boundary Element Method, and numerical evaluations are conducted through three different tests with benchmarks generated from Finite Element Method simulations.
This work presents the combination of the direct interpolation boundary element method (DIBEM) and the domain superposition technique (DST) to address piecewise inhomogeneous two dimensional Helmholtz problems, in which the internal constitutive property in each sector varies smoothly according to a known function. The domain integrals generated by the medium's heterogeneity are transformed into boundary integrals according to the DIBEM strategy where radial basis functions are used. The DST is applied to generate the influence coefficients related to the several sectors and compute them in the final matrix system. Thus, the proposed methodology preserves the main features and advantages of the Boundary Element Method. Concerning the evaluation of the numerical results, three different tests are performed, considering regular and irregular domains. For each example, benchmarks are generated by correlate simulations using the Finite Element Method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available