4.0 Article

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with continuous infusion of meropenem: A retrospective analysis of three years of clinical experience

Journal

ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages 321-328

Publisher

EDICIONES DOYMA S A
DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2021.11.006

Keywords

Meropenem; Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy; Continuous infusion; Hospital at home; Outcomes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and outcomes of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) with continuous infusion of meropenem (CIM) in a single center in northwest Spain. The results suggest that CIM can be an effective option for selected patients, but further research and validation are needed.
Introduction: Data regarding outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) with continuous infu-sion of meropenem (CIM) remain scarce and controversial. We aimed to analyze its outcomes.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients who received OPAT with CIM during a three-year period at a single center in northwest Spain. Demographics, clinical data and OPAT outcomes were recorded.Results: Since January 2017-December 2019, 34 patients received 35 OPAT episodes with CIM. The median age was 75 years, and 18 (51.4%) had a Charlson comorbidity index > 2. Twelve (34.3%) had res-piratory infection, 11 (31.4%) urinary tract infection, and 12 (34.3%) other infections. Twenty-one (60%) received a dose of 6 g/day, and 27 (77.1%) received combined antibiotic therapy. The duration of OPAT with CIM was 10 median days. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently (34.3%) isolated microor-ganism and 10 (28.6%) infections were polymicrobial. During OPAT and hospital at home unit admission, 4 (11.4%) patients had any adverse reaction that required CIM withdrawal, 2 (5.7%) were readmitted, and 3 (8.8%) died (2 infection-related deaths). After 30 days from discharge 6 (18.8%) of 32 not-censored patients had unplanned readmissions (2 infection-related), 6 (18.8%) developed recurrence (3 relapses, 3 reinfections) and 1 (3.1%) died (none-infection-related death). Twenty-three (71.9%) of these 32 patients did not experience unplanned readmission, recurrence or death.Conclusion: CIM can be an option to be administrated in OPAT programs in selected patients. Further studies are warranted to increase evidence regarding its use, and to externally validate our findings.& COPY; 2021 Sociedad Espanola de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologi & PRIME;a Cli & PRIME;nica. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available