4.4 Article

Prediction of coal flotation performance using a modified deep neural network model including three input parameters from feed

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2022.2036272

Keywords

Coal flotation; random forest; deep neural network; flotation performance; machine learning

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019XKQYMS18]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51904296]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a deep neural network (DNN) model was built based on a large amount of valid data to predict the quality of flotation products. By applying data augmentation method and proposing a new loss function, the prediction accuracy and generalization performance of the model were improved.
Flotation is an effective method widely used in coal preparation. However, the complexity of the flotation process and the actual production site make the quality detection of flotation products mainly depend on manual work. This makes the automation of the flotation process and the stability of product quality difficult. Furthermore, the published literature indicates commonly using only a few dozen data sets and application of traditional machine learning methods to predict the flotation performance. In this study, a total of 641 sets of valid data were collected for training and validation of the model. On this basis, a deep neural network (DNN) model was built to predict the quality of flotation products. 80% of the total data were used for training, and 20% for testing the DNN model. To improve the prediction accuracy and generalization performance of the model, a data augmentation method was applied and a new loss function was proposed. Finally, a DNN model was obtained, which is capable of maintaining high prediction accuracy by simply adjusting the input parameters while the feed properties are changing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available