4.7 Article

Unveiling the driving factors of carbon emissions from industrial resource allocation in China: A spatial econometric perspective

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112557

Keywords

Resource allocation; Carbon emissions; Spatial durbin model; Spatial autocorrelation

Funding

  1. key projects of natural science research of universities in Anhui province [KJ2018A0109]
  2. Anhui polytechnic university [2018YQQ022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that there are differences in industrial resource allocation efficiency among provinces, and factors affecting carbon emissions are not the same. Improving industrial resource allocation can reduce carbon emissions nationwide, but the effects vary by region.
Analyzing the relationship between industrial resource allocation and carbon emissions from the regional level will promote cross-regional environmental coordinated governance. Based on the panel data of 30 provinces from 2007 to 2016, this paper explores the spatial distribution of industrial resource allocation, spatial auto correlation of carbon emissions, and the relationship from a spatial econometric perspective. The results show that compared with other provinces, Jilin, Zhejiang, and Guangdong have relatively higher industrial resource allocation efficiency. The provinces with higher carbon emissions are spatially adjacent, and the provinces with lower carbon emissions are also spatially adjacent. On a national level, the improvement of industrial resource allocation can reduce carbon emissions. On a regional level, the impact of industrial resource allocation efficiency on carbon emissions is somewhat different. Industrial resource allocation can significantly reduce carbon emissions in the eastern region. However, it is not clear whether the improvement in the industrial resource allocation efficiency can reduce carbon emissions in the central, western, and northeast regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available