Gender and ethnic disparities in energy poverty: The case of South Africa

The study ascertained the differentiated energy poverty of female-headed households based on their race/ ethnicity in South Africa. The study made use of the 2016 General Household Survey (GHS). A sample of 7322 male-headed households and 6170 female-headed households was utilised. An Energy Vulnerability Index (EVI), Independent t-test and Propensity Score Matching (PSM) were used to analyse the data. The results show that male-headed households had more exposure, adaptive capacity and sensitivity to energy poverty compared to female-headed households. Overall, female-headed households were more vulnerable to energy poverty. Compared to White, Indian/Asian and Coloured female-headed households, Black/African female-headed households exhibited more vulnerability to energy poverty. The study concludes that gender of the household head and race/ethnicity of the female-headed households had impact on the energy poverty in South Africa. The study recommends the need to identify relevant gender and race/ethnic issues concerning energy. Furthermore, there is need to counter gendered-ethnic disparities in renewable energy programmes for poorer households, to avail alternative energy sources. Energy policy such as the Free Basic Electricity, besides being pro-poor, should also consider gender and the ethnic divide. Economic opportunities for low income female-headed households should also be promoted to reduce vulnerability to energy poverty.

Automated summary

The study investigated the energy poverty of female-headed households based on race/ethnicity in South Africa, finding that male-headed households were more affected. Female-headed households, especially Black/African ones, were generally more vulnerable to energy poverty. Gender of the household head and race/ethnicity of the female heads were found to impact energy poverty levels in South Africa, calling for gender-specific and race-aware policies to address these disparities.