Journal
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 250, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111278
Keywords
Numerical analysis; Earth-air heat exchanger; Phase change material; Summer weather conditions
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigates the thermal performance of two earth-to-air heat exchanger systems in a desertic climate during summer. The use of phase change material (PCM) and night injection of colder air were found to improve the system's thermal performance.
This work reports a transient numerical study of the thermal performance of two earth-to-air heat exchanger systems (EAHE) in summer weather conditions in a desertic climate. One conventional EAHE and the other with a phase change material (PCM) in the entrance under four different modes of operation/recovery (continuous, intermittent, intermittent-PCM-natural convection, and intermittent-PCM-mixed convection) to find the system that guarantees the best thermal performance. A detailed val-idation was made by comparing it with experimental and numerical data reported in the literature, under similar climatic conditions. The EAHE-PCM systems were used to reduce the thermal saturation of the soil, bringing with it an increase in the thermal performance of the EAHE system. The behavior of tem-peratures of the cooled air, soil, and PCM for each system are presented and analyzed. Besides the coef-ficients of performance are compared for each EAHE. It was found that the PCM selection is completely dependent on the environmental conditions in which the EAHE-PCM system will be used, with the right PCM the air temperature that is in contact with the soil was decreased up to 2.65 degrees C. The thermal recovery through the night injection of air (colder than soil average temperature) is an effective way to achieve a colder outlet temperate during the useful hours of cooling, besides, night injection was able to decrease the saturation factor from 0.356 to 0.296. The case that shows the best-modified coefficients of perfor-mance (COP*) is the ones with PCM and only passive cooling during the recovery mode (328.16) because in this case, the air blower has less operation time, in the other hand, the worst COP is seen in the case without PCM and all-day force convection (158.16), the case with PCM and night injection shows a COP* of 268.43. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available