4.7 Article

Behind electrochromic glazing: Assessing user's perception of glare from the sun in a controlled environment

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 256, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111738

Keywords

Discomfort glare; Electrochromic glazing; User assessment; Daylight

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the level of visible light transmittance required to prevent discomfort glare from the sun through blue tinted low transmittance glazing. The results suggest that a transmittance of 0.6% is sufficient to prevent glare for most users, but may not provide a comfortable situation. To achieve comfortable environments, a transmittance of 0.14% is recommended. For non-critical viewing directions, a transmittance of 0.6% is enough to create visually comfortable spaces for most participants. The study also compares different metrics for discomfort glare and finds that contrast-based metrics show higher correlations compared to saturation-based metrics.
The adaptable transmittance of electrochromic glazing allows to control the solar radiation entering buildings, yet the level of transmittance needed to protect from glare is still an unanswered question. To bridge this gap, this study evaluates the level of visible light transmittance (Tv) required for blue tinted low transmittance glazing to prevent discomfort glare when the sun is visible through the glazing. Twenty participants were exposed to four visual scenarios with varying viewing directions and window transmittance. Results indicate that when the sun is close to the central field of view, a normal hemispherical transmittance, tau(v, n-h) of 0.6% prevents disturbing glare for most users but does not provide a comfortable situation (this condition corresponds to a seen sun disc's luminance of 4.8 M cd/m(2)). To achieve comfortable situations, a tau(v, n-h) of 0.14% was found suitable. For non-critical viewing directions, tau(v, n-h) of 0.6% is sufficient to achieve visually comfortable space for most participants. This study also examined the reliability of five discomfort glare metrics by comparing their objective output to subjective responses for the tested conditions. The contrast-based metrics (Daylight Glare Probability, CIE Glare Index, Unified Glare Probability, Daylight Glare Index) possess a valid positional sensitivity and show higher Spearman's rank correlations (rho - 0.56-0.59) compared to solely saturation-based metrics as the vertical illuminance (E-v) (rho - 0.44). (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available