4.7 Review

Thermal comfort and energy performance of personal comfort systems (PCS): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 256, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111747

Keywords

Personal comfort system; Personal cooling devices; Personal heating devices; Thermal comfort; Energy performance

Funding

  1. Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education [502210196]
  2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project of Guangdong University of Technology [212210280]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of personal comfort systems used indoors, analyzing and comparing their effects. The findings provide a foundational reference for selecting energy-efficient and effective personal comfort systems to enhance thermal comfort for indoor occupants.
Personal comfort systems (PCSs) that are energy efficient have been widely used indoors to improve occupant thermal comfort and acceptability under a variety of thermo-hygrometric conditions. Although numerous studies have shown that the use of PCSs has beneficial effects, definitive conclusions on the effectiveness of PCSs on thermal comfort enhancement have yet to be drawn. Furthermore, detailed analyses of specific indoor conditions that may be the most promising are lacking. As a result, a comprehensive meta-analysis review was conducted to summarize, analyze, and compare findings from eligible documented studies on the effects of various PCSs on occupants' perceptual responses. Besides, the energy performance of various PCSs was examined. The effects of total cooling or heating area as well as types of PCSs, on occupants' perceptual responses were specifically addressed. This systematic review and meta-analysis serve as a foundational reference source for the selection of highly energy-efficient and effective personal comfort systems to improve thermal comfort of indoor occupants. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available