4.7 Review

Calibrating building energy simulation models: A review of the basics to guide future work

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 253, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111533

Keywords

Building performance simulation; Building simulation; Calibration; Reproducibility; Optimization; Uncertainty

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore, Singapore [R-296-000-190-133]
  2. Republic of Singapore's National Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides a foundation for future research by conducting a detailed systematic review of vital aspects of BES calibration through meta-analysis and categorization. Reproducible simulations are identified as a critical issue, and an incremental approach is proposed to encourage future research's reproducibility.
Building energy simulation (BES) plays a significant role in buildings with applications such as architec-tural design, retrofit analysis, and optimizing building operation and controls. There is a recognized need for model calibration to improve the simulations' credibility, especially with building data becoming increasingly available and the promises that a digital twin brings. However, BES calibration remains chal-lenging due to the lack of clear guidelines and best practices. This study aims to provide the foundation for future research through a detailed systematic review of the vital aspects of BES calibration. Specifically, we conducted a meta-analysis and categorization of the simulation inputs and outputs, data type and resolution, key calibration methods, and calibration performance evaluation. This study also identified reproducible simulations as a critical issue and proposes an incremental approach to encourage future research's reproducibility. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available