4.7 Article

Application of solar PV in commercial buildings: Utilizability of rooftops

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 257, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111774

Keywords

Solar energy; PV; Renewable energy; Buildings; Sustainability; Rooftop; Utilizability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the utilisability of commercial buildings' roofs for solar PV, identifying and categorizing different types of restrictive features. The results are validated and assessed through site visits and remote sensing techniques.
Solar PV is one of the most successful renewable energy technologies being used in buildings. Buildings however pose different types of hurdles towards their utilisability for PV. Given the low power density of solar PV, buildings' restrictive features can have a significant impact on the application of renewable technology. This study aims to investigate the utilisability of commercial buildings' roofs for solar PV focusing on four types of buildings -shopping malls, office buildings, hotels, and hospitals. The study investigates the wide-ranging features of rooftops of these buildings which can restrict the application of PV. A total of 117 buildings have been examined in the study with the help of remote sensing techniques. Site visits are carried out for an in-depth assessment of the roof characteristics and to validate the results of the roof area estimation made through the satellite images. 16 different types of physical hurdles have been identified and classified under four main categories: architectural/structural, services, miscellaneous and associate restrictions. Roof utilization factors for the studied buildings, calculated for five different orientations, have been found to range between 0.45 and 0.52. The PV utilizable area at the city level has also been calculated with the help of a regression analysis. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available