4.7 Article

Experimental Investigation of the Combustion Properties of an Average Thermal Runaway Gas Mixture from Li-Ion Batteries

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 3247-3258

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c04057

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [2037795]
  2. TEES Turbomachinery Laboratory
  3. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) through Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission (SACM) [1440/10079/9]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [2037795] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through experiments and numerical analysis, it was found that modern detailed kinetics mechanisms can accurately predict the combustion properties of thermal runaway gases from a lithium-ion battery.
To assess the fire hazard associated with venting gases coming from a lithium-ion battery during a thermal runaway, a mixture representative of such venting gas was determined by averaging 40 gas compositions presented in the literature. The final mixture is composed of C3H8, C2H6, C2H4, CH4, H-2, CO, and CO2. The combustion properties of this mixture were determined using various combustion devices: shock tubes for ignition delay time measurements in air and for H2O time histories in very dilute mixtures (99% Ar), as well as a closed bomb to measure the laminar flame speeds. Experiments were performed at around atmospheric pressure and for several equivalence ratios in all cases. Several detailed kinetics models from the literature were assessed against the data generated with this very complex mixture, and it was found that modern detailed kinetics mechanisms were capable of appropriately predicting the combustion properties of thermal runaway gases from a battery in most cases, with the NUIGMech 1.1 model being the most accurate. A numerical analysis was conducted with the two most modern models to explain the results and highlight the most important reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available