4.7 Article

Remaining useful life prediction of lithium battery based on capacity regeneration point detection

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 234, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121233

Keywords

Capacity regeneration; RUL; Lithium battery; Particle filter; Mann-Whitney U test; Autoregressive model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61873102, 61873197]
  2. Key Natural Science Foundation of Hubei [2019CFA047]
  3. MOE Key Laboratory of Image Processing and Intelligence Control [IPIC2018-10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study combines particle filter and Mann-Whitney U test to detect the capacity regeneration point of lithium batteries, using autoregressive model and PF algorithm for RUL prediction. The method is validated through experiments, showing improved prediction accuracy and reduced error rate.
Lithium batteries have been widely used in various electronic devices, and the accurate prediction of its remaining useful life (RUL) can prevent the occurrence of sudden equipment failure. Battery capacity is a commonly used indicator to represent the health status of lithium batteries. However, the capacity regeneration is usually unavoidable due to the impact of battery rest time between two cycles, which leads to inaccurate prediction of the RUL. To solve this problem, this paper combines the particle filter (PF) and Mann-Whitney U test (PF-U) to detect the capacity regeneration point (CRP). In this light, the autoregressive (AR) model and PF algorithm are adopted for RUL prediction. The predicted capacity through AR model is used to update the degradation model parameters of PF algorithm, and the validation of our approach is verified through the lithium battery dataset of NASA. In comparison, our proposed method exhibits the highest precision and provides a platform to detect the points with capacity regeneration, and further reduce the RUL prediction error. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available