4.7 Article

High-resolution mesoscale wind-resource assessment of Fiji using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 232, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121047

Keywords

Wind energy; Resource assessment; Wind power; WRF; Fiji

Funding

  1. New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (NZMFAT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a high-resolution mesoscale wind-resource assessment of Fiji using the WRF model, identifying potential for wind power generation and discovering 40 high wind-resource areas.
This study presents a high-resolution mesoscale wind-resource assessment of the small island developing state (SIDS) of Fiji using a 10-year simulation of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with convection-permitting resolution. Our analysis evaluates the wind speed and Weibull distributions, diurnal and seasonal wind speed patterns, resource maps of annual and seasonal wind speed, power density, model statistical analysis and interannual wind speed variability. The results reveal that the WRF-model simulated wind resource parameters are in good agreement with observations at 24 existing weather stations. At 55 m above ground, the annual mean wind speed and wind power density varies from 1.5 m/s to 8 m/s and 50 W/m(2) to 300 W/m(2), respectively, for onshore land areas. Higher wind speeds are observed during austral winter than in austral summer. Forty high wind-resource areas are identified in this study, which were previously unknown. This indicates that there is potential for utility scale wind power generation at selected locations with wind speed and power density greater than 6.4 m/s and 300 W/m(2) (NREL, Wind Power Class 3). An estimated 1000 MW theoretical potential installed capacity is available for utility-scale wind power applications on Viti Levu and Vanua Levu. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available