4.7 Article

Reactive separation processes applied to biodiesel production from residual oils and fats: Design, optimization and techno-economic assessment of routes using solid catalysts

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 240, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122784

Keywords

Biodiesel; Catalytic absorption; Catalytic distillation; Esterification; Solid acid-catalyzed

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq
  2. Agency for the Financing of Studies and Projects - FINEP
  3. Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education - Capes [001]
  4. FACEPE/NUQAAPE [APQ-0346-1.06/14]
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada - NSERC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three solid acid-catalyzed processes for biodiesel production were designed and optimized, with processes A and B found to be the most economically and environmentally friendly options. Process A, with a simpler flowsheet, was identified as the best choice compared to process B.
Three solid acid-catalyzed (SAC) processes for biodiesel production from residual oil and fats (ROFs) with HWSi/Al2O3 as catalyst were designed and optimized using Aspen Plus: simultaneous esterification, transesterification, and methanol separation based on catalytic distillation (CD) (process A) and catalytic absorption (CA) (process B), where CA has not yet been investigated in these conditions; and hydroesterification industrial process using CD (process C1). For the first time, processes A, B and C based on SAC route were optimized and compared regarding to techno-economic and environmental aspects. Processes A and B were the most economically and eco-friendly options. Compared to process B, process A was the best option due to simpler flowsheet. Process A2 presented 25.6, 60.1, 4.6, 8.6, 52.6 and 62.8% lower capital, utilities (C-util), operation, total annualized (TAC), waste treatment (C-waste) and CO2 emission costs than process C1. A global optimization developed for process A saved 430 k$/year on TAC. After a heat integration, process B presented 4.9 and 10.8% lower C-util and C-waste than process A. Process A was also designed for FFA levels of 5-25 wt%, where the biodiesel break-even price remained competitive (0.48-0.75 $/kg) with diesel price. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available