4.7 Article

The pattern of household energy transition

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 234, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121277

Keywords

Household energy use; Energy transition; Energy ladder; Energy mix; Simultaneous equations

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71925008, 71950007, 71673026]
  2. National Key Technology RD Program [2016YFA0602801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals the non-linear pattern of household energy transition, showing that coal and oil shares increase and then decline as income rises. The transition is also influenced by factors like urbanization, demographics, and resource endowment.
This study detects the pattern of household energy transition of large countries (population > 10 million) with more than 90% of the world energy consumption. Simultaneous equations are used to capture the multidimensional information of energy mix with panel data from 1990 to 2016. The results indicate the non-linear pattern of the income and energy mix in the household sector. The peaks of coal and oil shares are separately captured. As income develops, the share of coal increases first and then declines, peaking at $4800 (Purchasing Power Parity, constant 2011 international dollars), and the trend of oil share is similar to coal but peaks later at $7100. Economic ascent generally involves a significant substitution away from traditional bioenergy and toward modern fuels such as natural gas and electricity. Except for economic factors, the pattern of the household energy transition is related to urbanization, demographics and resource endowment. In particular, for emerging market countries, households are subjected to aging trends and fossil endowments to increase their dependence on coal and are less likely to climb higher up the energy ladder, at least in the short term. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available