4.7 Article

Soft computing analysis of a compressed air energy storage and SOFC system via different artificial neural network architecture and tri-objective grey wolf optimization

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 236, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121412

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cell; Compressed air energy storage; Grey wolf optimizer; Artificial neural network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel combined system of SOFC, ORC, and CAES is proposed and optimized using the grey wolf multi-objective optimization approach, which saves time significantly. The thermodynamic performance of the system at different periods is optimized, showing improvements in energy, exergy, economic, and environmental aspects.
In the present study, a novel combined system consisting of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), organic Rankine cycle (ORC), and compressed air energy storage (CAES) is proposed, investigated, and optimized. The SOFC and CAES models are validated individually to ensure the accuracy of the results. Here, the grey wolf multi-objective optimization (MOGWO) approach is applied to find the optimal system design and performance. For this, a trained neural network is provided to the MOGWO algorithm as a fitted function, and multi-objective optimization is carried out on it. The most significant benefit of the suggested method is time-saving. The proposed system's thermodynamic performance is investigated from the energy, exergy, economic, and environmental (4E) points of view at three periods, including full-time, charging, and discharging periods. The results indicate that the Levenberg-Marquardt training algorithm has the best performance among all of the algorithms. The value of exergetic round trip efficiency (ERTE), total cost rate, and CO2 emission at the best optimum point are obtained as 45.7%, 34.2 $/h, and 0.22 kg/kWh, respectively. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available