4.7 Article

Integration of a coal fired power plant with calcium looping CO2 capture and concentrated solar power generation: Energy, exergy and economic analysis

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 240, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122466

Keywords

Calcium looping; CO2 capture and compression; Coal fired power plant; Concentrated solar power; Energy efficiency; Exergy efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a CaL-CSP system was modeled to integrate with a 500 MW coal-fired power plant, utilizing two steam cycles for heat recovery. The system does not impose any thermal efficiency drop on the power plant and its economic performance is competitive with other CO2 capture technologies.
In conventional calcium looping (CaL) CO2 capture process, the heat of calcination is provided by burning additional fuel in the calciner that leads to thermal efficiency drop of the power plant. Coupling of CaL with concentrated solar power (CSP) can supply required heat and improve its drawback. In this study, a CaL-CSP system has been modeled to integrate with a 500 MW coal-fired power plant. Moreover, two steam cycles were designed to effectively recover available heat sources. The performance of the system was evaluated by employing energy, exergy and economic analysis. For CO2 capture efficiency of 93%, the calciner requires 1293 MWth thermal power which was supplied by heliostat field with efficiency of 88.56%. The net electrical efficiency of the overall system and the levelized cost of electricity were determined 33.22% and 120.27 $/MWh respectively. The results showed that the designed system does not impose any thermal efficiency drop on the power plant and its economic performance is competitive with other CO2 capture technologies. The exergy analysis indicated that the calciner side had a lower exergy efficiency (82.61%) in comparison with the carbonator side (88.51%) due to the higher exergy destruction in the calciner reactor and the compression unit. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available