4.7 Article

A new approach on quantification of flexibility index in multi-carrier energy systems towards optimally energy hub management

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 232, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120973

Keywords

Multi-carrier energy systems; Uncertainty; Flexibility; Dispatchability; Demand response

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel robust-based flexibility evaluation method is proposed for multi-carrier energy systems (MCESs) to quantify the maximum potentiality of the energy hub to compensate for the maximum uncertainty. The method is implemented through a two-level optimization framework to achieve optimal and deterministic scheduling of MCESs.
Multi-carrier energy systems (MCESs) are identified as intermediate frameworks among different energy carriers aiming to optimally meet diverse energy demands. In this study, a novel robust-based flexibility evaluation method is proposed for MCESs to quantify the maximum potentiality of the energy hub to compensate for the maximum uncertainty. For this purpose, a singular flexibility index is first calculated via the definition of apposite corrective actions, including purchasing the supplementary input carriers and implementing the demand response programs (DRPs). Then, given various individual uncertainty sets, a new bi-level optimization framework is introduced to achieve the optimal and deterministic scheduling of MCESs in the upper-level and determining the largest uncertainty radiuses in the lower level. The demonstrated method is formulated as a second-order cone programming and is solved through an iteration-based search algorithm. The presented structure is implemented for a sample energy hub to confirm its extensive capability to apply various flexible options as compared to the information gap decision theory (IGDT). The maximum uncertainty margin in the electrical load is averagely equal to 79% of the predicted demand. The proposed method could be also fruitful for the robust scheduling of the energy hub in a worst-case scenario while considering the maximum uncertainty. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available