4.7 Article

Sewage sludge and the energy balance of Jerusalem artichoke production - A case study in north-eastern Poland

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 236, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121545

Keywords

Helianthus tuberosus L.; Energy inputs; Energy output; Energy gain; Energy efficiency ratio

Funding

  1. University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn [30.610.013-110]
  2. Minister of Science and Higher Education [010/RID/2018/19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Results from a field experiment showed that using sewage sludge as fertilizer can reduce energy demand, increase crop yield, and improve energy efficiency.
Sewage sludge is a specific by-product of wastewater treatment and its use as fertilizer is the most rational and the cheapest strategy for managing this waste product. In this study, the production of aerial biomass, energy inputs and the energy efficiency ratio of Jerusalem artichoke (JA) fertilized with sewage sludge at rates equivalent to 100 and 160 kg N ha(-1) were evaluated in a field experiment conducted in north-eastern Poland in 2018-2020. In conventional treatments supplied with mineral fertilizer, energy inputs were determined at 23.5-28.1 GJ ha(-1) in the year of plantation establishment and at 12.6-18.3 GJ ha(-1) in the second and third year. In treatments fertilized with sewage sludge, the demand for energy was lower by 27-32 % in the first year and by 48-54 % in the second and third year. Regardless of fertilizer type the optimal nitrogen rate was 100 kg ha(-1) (11.7-11.9 Mg ha(-1) DM y(-1)). The biomass of JA plants supplied with 100 kg N ha(-1) was also characterized by the highest energy output and energy gain. Energy gain was 5-11 % higher per hectare, and the energy efficiency ratio was nearly twice higher in treatments supplied with sewage sludge than with mineral fertilizer. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available