4.7 Article

Psychological insights for incentive-based demand response incorporating battery energy storage systems: A two-loop Stackelberg game approach

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 239, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122192

Keywords

Incentive-based demand response; Behavioral economics; Psychological factors; Diversified response resources; Two-loop Stackelberg game; Hierarchical electricity market

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of customer psychological factors on incentive-based demand response strategy and proposes an IBDR model considering customer psychological factors and BESSs. The results show that incorporating CPFs is crucial in interpreting customer behavior, and BESSs are preferred over load reduction in meeting customer demands.
Demand-side resources play a significant role in enhancing energy efficiency and decarbonization. Performing demand curtailment will psychologically disturb end-customers' comfort and affect decision making. The penetration of battery energy storage systems (BESSs) in electricity grids introduces another response resource to the grid operator (GO). Therefore, it's important to investigate the effect of different customer psychological factors (CPFs) on incentive-based demand response (IBDR) strategy in the system with diversified response resources including BESSs. Behavioral economics (BE) interprets individual behavior from psychology and provides insights to behavior modeling. Therefore, this paper applied BE to incorporate CPFs, such as the endowment effect and time-discounting effect. Furthermore, to bring the value of CPFs to the system level, an IBDR model considering CPFs and BESSs (CE-IBDR) is proposed by following the Stackelberg game theory. Upon the participation of load aggregators (LAs) and BESSs operator (EO) in IBDR, the model extends two-party hierarchical levels to four-party spinning from the GO, EOs, LAs and end-customers by extending the two-party Stackelberg game to a two-loop Stackelberg game. Results show that without incorporating CPFs into the model will result deviation in interpreting customer behavior. BESSs is preferred reponse resource than load reduction due to the pressure to incentive end-customers with high endowment valuation. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available