4.5 Article

Analysis of Designs of Heat Exchangers Used in Adsorption Chillers

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14238038

Keywords

adsorption chiller; heat exchanger; heat and mass transfer; HEX heat capacity

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland [16.16.210.476]
  2. AGH University of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes the impact of design and material selection of heat exchangers in adsorption chillers on heat and mass transfer. The paper suggests introducing a new evaluation index to address the limitations of current SCP and COP coefficients for comparative analysis.
In the face of increasing demands with regard to the share of renewable energy sources in the energy mix, adsorption chillers are becoming a potentially important part of the energy transition. A key component of this type of equipment is the heat exchanger in the adsorption bed, the design of which affects both heat and mass transfer. This study includes an analysis of the geometry and materials used to manufacture such heat exchangers. The geometry analysis is mainly based on the evaluation of the impact of the different dimensions of the exchanger components on heat and mass transfer in the bed. The second part of the study focuses on material-related issues where the main emphasis is on the analysis of the thermal inertia of the exchanger. The paper analyses the latest research on the design of exchangers in adsorption beds, mainly from 2015-2021. Currently, the commonly used SCP and COP coefficients and various test conditions do not provide sufficient information for comparative analysis of adsorption bed heat exchangers, so the authors propose to introduce a new index for the evaluation of heat exchangers in terms of the effect of the design parameters on the energy efficiency of an adsorption chiller.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available