4.5 Article

Design Procedure Based on Maximum Efficiency for Wireless Power Transfer Battery Chargers with Lightweight Vehicle Assembly

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15010070

Keywords

wireless power transfer; inductive power transfer; battery charger; design procedure

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper analyzes two different design procedures for a series-parallel compensated WPT battery charger based on different definitions of the operating resonant frequency in the condition of maximum link efficiency. The behavior of the voltage gain magnitude and the input impedance angle of the resulting WPT links is studied for different loads and coupling coefficients. The design algorithms are supported by analytical formulas derived from an exact circuit analysis of the WPT link, avoiding approximations as far as possible. A case study is proposed to support the theoretical approach, in which both design procedures are implemented considering specifications in line with the actual automotive standards. Finally, the efficiency in both cases is characterized.
This paper analyzes two different design procedures for a series-parallel compensated WPT battery charger, based on different definitions of the operating resonant frequency in the condition of maximum link efficiency. The behaviour of the voltage gain magnitude and the input impedance angle of the resulting WPT links is studied for different loads and coupling coefficients. The design algorithms are supported by analytical formulas derived from an exact circuit analysis of the WPT link, avoiding approximations as far as possible. To support the theoretical approach a case study is proposed, in which both design procedures are implemented considering specifications in line with the actual automotive standards. To conclude, a characterization of the efficiency in both cases is derived.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available