4.5 Article

Experimental Study on Tight Sandstone Reservoir Gas Permeability Improvement Using Electric Heating

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15041438

Keywords

tight gas; high temperature; electric heating; heating mechanism; permeability enhancement

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of high temperatures on the microstructure of tight sandstone formations, finding that heating to certain thresholds can significantly improve gas permeability. Electric heating is identified as a potential method for enhancing the productivity and exploitation efficiency of tight gas formations.
Although tight sandstone gas formations are abundant in China, their single-well productivities and exploitation efficiencies are restricted by water blocking from drilling and completion. At present, shut-in, chemical additive application, and hydraulic fracturing are the common approaches applied to handle this problem. However, these approaches are also characterized by low efficiencies or even cause secondary damage. In this study, the impact of high temperatures (of up to 800 degrees C) on the microstructure of a tight sandstone, including water blocking and gas permeability, are investigated through the electric heating of a simulated wellbore. The results show that the threshold temperature for fracturing of the tight sandstone is approximately 450 to 600 degrees C. Many secondary microcracks emerged near the wellbore beyond this temperature, improving the gas permeability, with some microcracks visible even after cooling. The gas permeability of the formation after heating to 800 degrees C increased by 456% and 3992% compared with the initial gas permeability and the water-blocking impacted gas permeability, respectively. This study demonstrates that electric heating is a potential method for improving the permeability of tight gas formations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available