Journal
ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14196089
Keywords
geothermal energy; subsurface storage; aqueous geochemistry; scaling; formation damage
Categories
Funding
- Canada First Research Excellence Fund [CFREF-2015-00001]
- Alberta Innovates [CTD 2018-027]
- Helmholtz Climate Initiative (HI-CAM) - Helmholtz Associations Initiative and Networking Fund
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Researchers propose a project to store waste heat in an underground geothermal storage system and conduct a geochemical risk assessment to evaluate potential reactions that may cause scale formation and formation damage. The results suggest that the project could successfully store heat with proper management of the geochemical risks.
The campus of the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) contains several waste heat streams. In an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by optimizing thermal power consumption on the campus, researchers at the KIT are proposing a 'DeepStor' project, which will sequester waste heat from these streams in an underground reservoir during the summer months, when the heat is not required. The stored heat will then be reproduced in the winter, when the campus's thermal power demand is much higher. This paper contains a preliminary geochemical risk assessment for the operation of this subsurface, seasonal geothermal energy storage system. We used equilibrium thermodynamics to determine the potential phases and extent of mineral scale formation in the plant's surface infrastructure, and to identify possible precipitation, dissolution, and ion exchange reactions that may lead to formation damage in the reservoir. The reservoir in question is the Meletta Beds of the Upper Rhein Graben's Froidefontaine Formation. We modeled scale- and formation damage-causing reactions during six months of injecting 140 degrees C fluid into the reservoir during the summer thermal storage season and six months of injecting 80 degrees C fluid during the winter thermal consumption season. Overall, we ran the models for 5 years. Anhydrite and calcite are expected mineral scales during the thermal storage season (summer). Quartz is the predicted scale-forming mineral during the thermal consumption period (winter). Within similar to 20 m of the wellbores, magnesium and iron are leached from biotite; calcium and magnesium are leached from dolomite; and sodium, aluminum, and silica are leached from albite. These reactions lead to a net increase in both porosity and permeability in the wellbore adjacent region. At a distance of similar to 20-75 m from the wellbores, the leached ions recombine with the reservoir rocks to form a variety of clays, i.e., saponite, minnesotaite, and daphnite. These alteration products lead to a net loss in porosity and permeability in this zone. After each thermal storage and production cycle, the reservoir shows a net retention of heat, suggesting that the operation of the proposed DeepStor project could successfully store heat, if the geochemical risks described in this paper can managed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available