4.5 Article

The Effect of Inert Fuel Compounds on Flame Characteristics

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15010262

Keywords

low-calorific burner; low NOx burner; combustion; inert gas; alternative gaseous fuels

Categories

Funding

  1. CzechMinistry of Education, Youth, and Sports/EU Operational Programme Research, Development and Education [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_026/0008413]
  2. Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (TACR) [TN1000007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the effects of inert compounds on different process burners and finds that under certain conditions, inert gases can decrease NOx emissions and increase heat flux. However, their impact on flame patterns and temperature fields remains uncertain.
To describe the effects of inert compounds in gaseous fuel, experiments on three different process burners (staged fuel burner, staged air burner, and low-calorific burner) were carried out. The tested burners are commercially available, but they were specially designed for experimental usage. Tests were carried out in the semi-industrial burner testing facility to investigate the influence of inert gases on the flame characteristics, emissions, and heat flux to the combustion chamber wall. Natural gas was used as a reference fuel, and, during all tests, thermal power of 500 kW was maintained. To simulate the combustion of alternative fuels with lower LHV, N-2 and CO2 were used as diluents. The inert gas in the hydrocarbon fuel at certain conditions can lower NOx emissions (up to 80%) and increase heat flux (up to 5%). Once incombustible compounds are present in the fuel, the higher amount of fuel flowing through nozzles affects the flow in the combustion chamber by increasing the Reynolds number. This can change the flame pattern and temperature field, and it can be both positive and negative, depending on actual conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available