Journal
ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 21, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14216870
Keywords
vortex generator; arrangement; heat transfer; numerical simulation
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study focuses on the impact and optimization of vortex generators in radiators on the ends of motor coils, concluding that a 45-degree attack angle generator is most effective. Results show that FD with a longitudinal distance of 4 h performs well at Reynolds numbers below 4000, while FU-4 h-0.5 h is more prominent at higher Reynolds numbers.
At present, vortex generators have been extensively used in radiators to improve the overall heat transfer performance. However, there is no research on the effect of vortex generators on the ends of motor coils. Meanwhile, the current research mainly concentrates on the attack angle, shape and size, and lacks a detailed study on the transverse and longitudinal distance and arrangement of vortex generators. In this paper, the improved dimensionless number R is used as the key index to evaluate the overall performance of enhanced heat transfer. Firstly, the influence of the attack angle on heat transfer enhancement is discussed through a single pair of rectangular vortex generators, and the results demonstrate that the vortex generator with a 45 degrees attack angle is superior. On this basis, we compare the effects of different longitudinal distances (2 h, 4 h, and 6 h, h meaning the height of vortex generator) on enhanced heat transfer under four distribution modes: Flow-Up (FU), Flow-Down (FU), Flow-Up-Down (FUD), Flow-Down-UP (FDU). Thereafter, the performances of different transverse distances (0.25 h, 0.5 h, and 0.75 h) of the vortex generators are numerically simulated. When comparing the longitudinal distances, FD with a longitudinal distance of 4 h (FD-4 h) performs well when the Reynolds number is less than 4000, and FU with a longitudinal distance of 4 h (FU-4 h) performs better when the Reynolds number is greater than 4000. Similarly, in the comparison of transverse distances, FD-4 h still performs well when the Reynolds number is less than 4000, and FU with a longitudinal distance of 4 h and transverse distance of 0.5 h (FU-4 h-0.5 h) is more prominent when the Reynolds number is greater than 4000.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available