4.5 Article

Sex-Specific Associations of Iron-Anemia Status With Hemoglobin A1C Levels Among Hispanics/Latinos Without Self-Reported Diabetes Mellitus: The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

Journal

ENDOCRINE PRACTICE
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 282-291

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.11.086

Keywords

anemia; hemoglobin A1C; iron and anemia status; iron deficiency; probable diabetes mellitus; Hispanics/Latinos

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HC65233, N01-HC65234, N01-HC65235, N01-HC65236, N01-HC65237, 75N92019D00012]
  2. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  3. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
  4. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
  5. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  6. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  7. National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the sex-specific associations between mutually exclusive iron-anemia status categories and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels in U.S. Hispanics/Latinos without self-reported diabetes. The results showed that women with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) had higher odds of prediabetes and probable diabetes mellitus based on HbA1C levels, while men with non-IDA had higher odds of probable diabetes mellitus. This highlights the importance of considering iron-anemia status when interpreting elevated HbA1C levels in this population.
Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the sex-specific associations of mutually exclusive iron-anemia status categories with hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels among U.S. Hispanics/Latinos without self-reported diabetes mellitus. Methods: Baseline cross-sectional data (7247 women and 4904 men without self-reported diabetes mellitus) from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos were analyzed. Per the American Diabetes Association's defined criteria, based on HbA1C levels, the participants were categorized as having normoglycemia, prediabetes, or probable diabetes mellitus. The iron-anemia status categories were as follows: no anemia and no iron deficiency (reference), iron deficiency, iron deficiency anemia (IDA), and non-iron deficiency anemia (non-IDA). Survey multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine the sex-specific associations of iron-anemia status with HbA1C levels after adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors. Results: The age-standardized prevalence of iron-anemia status categories differed by sex. Compared with those with no anemia and no iron deficiency and normoglycemia, women with IDA had higher odds of having prediabetes (odds ratio [OR], 2.18; 95% CI, 1.64-2.89) and probable diabetes mellitus (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.62-7.99) based on HbA1C levels; men with non-IDA had higher odds of having probable diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.13-7.78) based on HbA1C levels. All other associations did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Among U.S. Hispanics/Latinos without self-reported diabetes mellitus, the age-standardized prevalence of iron deficiency, IDA, and non-IDA is high and varies by sex. Women with IDA had higher odds of having prediabetes and probable diabetes mellitus, defined based on HbA1C levels. Men with non-IDA had higher odds of having probable diabetes mellitus, defined based on HbA1C levels. Iron-anemia status should be considered while interpreting elevated HbA1C levels among U.S. Hispanics/Latinos without self-reported diabetes mellitus. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the AACE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available